Corporate
Responsibility and TESG

IV. Corporate Responsibility and TESG

(GRI 3-1) (WEF 3) 

Materialidad

(GRI 3-1-a-i)

Ecopetrol periodically conducts a materiality assessment to identify, analyze, and prioritize corporate responsibility and TESG concerns, including social, environmental, governance, and human rights issues, which may have an impact on the Company’s business performance and on its Stakeholder Groups. Positive and negative impacts on the economy, the people, and the environment have been identified to this end, considering factors associated with the relevance of each of the issues for all Stakeholder Groups, as well as the level of risk that inadequate or poor management represents for the Company. Below are some of the internal and external sources of information that provide inputs for the prioritization of said issues:

  1. The Ecopetrol Group’s corporate strategy and strategic risk map.
  2. Analysis of national and global corporate responsibility and TESG trends. This includes the social, economic, and political context in which the Ecopetrol Group operates.
  3. Stakeholder perceptions and expectations: the Company annually conducts the Stakeholder Perception and Expectation Survey, which shows the Stakeholders’ assessments and expectations regarding the Company’s management efforts. Based on the results of this survey, Ecopetrol is able to analyze the priorities of the groups that it interacts with and create engagement plans to inform and take action on the prioritized issues in the process.
  4. Corporate responsibility and TESG information requirements and requests pertaining to reporting instruments and disclosure of the contents in the Reporting Guide.
  5. Mechanisms for filing requests, complaints, and claims.
  6. Due diligence exercised on Human Rights.

Given that this exercise takes place every three (3) years, both the materiality of the Ecopetrol Group and that of its Stakeholder Groups is expected to be updated in 2023.

(GRI 3-1-a-i, 3-1-a-ii)

In 2020, the Ecopetrol Group updated its materiality, including inputs from all Stakeholder Groups, as well as the analysis of the risks, challenges, and goals associated with the corporate strategy and its long-term aspiration and vision. As a result of this exercise, potential positive and negative impacts were identified, which were integrated into 28 material elements classified into four (4) levels of prioritization. 

(GRI 3-2-a)

Exceptional Elements:

  • Climate change
  • Integrated water management
  • Local development

Notable Elements:

  • Biodiversity and ecosystem services
  • Circular economy
  • Use of alternative energy and sources
  • Fuel quality
  • Talent attraction, development, and retention
  • Air quality
  • Occupational health and industrial safety
  • Process safety

Differentiated Elements:

  • Corporate governance
  • Diversity and inclusion
  • Business ethics and risk culture
  • Operational continuity system

Compliance Elements:

  • Transparency and prevention of compliance risks
  • Disclosure of information
  • Disincorporation of wells and facilities
  • Supply chain management
  • Cultural heritage (ethnic and archaeological)
  • Labor standards
  • Management of real estate rights
  • Land uses
  • Conservation and environmental protection areas
  • Public policy
  • Comprehensive management system
  • Access to information and citizen participation
  • Prevention and management of incidents caused by third parties

Stakeholder Groups

Ecopetrol has identified seven (7) Stakeholder Groups, as listed below:

Figure 25 Stakeholder Groups
Source: Vice Presidency of Corporate Affairs and Secretary General.
(GRI 3-1-b)

Stakeholder Groups’ 2022
Perception and Expectations Survey

Figure 26 Suppliers and their workers
Environmental
Social
Governance
Figure 27 Employees, pensioners, and beneficiaries
Environmental
Social
Governance
Figure 28 Associates and partners
Environmental
Social
Governance
Figure 29 Society and community
Environmental
Social
Governance
Figure 30 Shareholders and investors
Environmental
Social
Governance
Figure 31 Local state
Environmental
Social
Governance
Figure 32 Customers
Environmental
Social
Governance